Why do you use Firefox? Here are my responses to why I use Mozilla / Firefox:Ī) Pipelining: When you browser connects to a web page, it goes through several steps. Now The Boston Globe is asking people why they use Firefox / Mozilla. And if your are running XP their wont be any more upgrades to the browser until Longhorn. IE is no longer applicable, unless your running XP. In fact, I would argue that Microsoft’s current all-encompassing pursuit of every market under the sun is a strategy to brace themselves for the impending doom of a paradigm shift that they can feel looming ahead. This will be a long, drawn-out process, probably to end in another corporate domination of some sort, but I would not be surprised if Microsoft ended up as a niche player, still making money, but not as visible. Ultimately, the browser wars will not be an issue anymore rather, the OS wars will take center stage.
MOZILLA FIREFOX FREE DOWNLOAD FOR WINDOWS XP STANDALONE MAC
In addition to some Mozilla variant being the browser of choice on Linux, there has been talk of integrating the Gecko engine into a future version of Mac OS. The portion it will never win back, though, is in the alternative OS sector, which will continue growing. On the other hand, I expect IE to gain back most of the market share it lost, as people find it once again meets their needs on new computers. This is good, because perhaps web developing will finally be truly write-once, run anywhere. NET extensions for corporate applications and consumer “web services”, rather than on a direct stranglehold of the browsing experience. For the future, they seem to be banking on.
It makes web developers’ lives harder, and has ceased creating much revenue for them (the only licensee of IE I can think of is AOL, and I can’t remember the last time I heard of someone developing with MS FrontPage).
Microsoft seems to realize the futility of trying to create a browser lock-in strategy.
By the time Longhorn comes out, Microsoft will have come up with a totally revamped, standards-compliant IE, and by that time everyone will be happy about it. So they’re letting Firefox get a hold in the market to the point where web developers can no longer ignore it. Microsoft probably realizes the need to switch to a more standards-based browser, but they didn’t want to be the ones to fork it on people first, because they didn’t want web developers getting upset with them for breaking the old proprietary code. Maybe Microsoft wants Firefox to gain a significant hold in the marketplace.
When its 5 years apart.ģ) Charging 300 USD for a new OS just to get a new browser, with some precieved enhancements? Not a good thing either. Yeah… o’sure, thats a real good thing… keeping the same browser around at 5 year streaches… When people realize that the development pace of OSS and having new features added every few months or semi-annualy… I think that users will wake up and use a different product…ġ) Intergrating a browser and an OS is a bad thing.Ģ) Uprgading a browser with the release of an OS, is also a bad thing. The company increasingly has tied IE development to the development path for its Windows operating system.” “Microsoft has not released a major version of Internet Explorer in three years, since it launched IE 6. So basically that limits the web to MS users alone. Maybe because MS makes their own standard which does not correspond to the w3c standard. “We think they’ll find the site compatibility with IE is better, the support from Microsoft is better and that the compatibility with business applications is better-all the things that drove them to use IE in the first place,” he said.”
0 kommentar(er)
